Asus X200MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus X200MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X200MA
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '18 at 12:29
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 24.5
2-Core 48
33% 45.8 Pts
4-Core 48.3
8-Core 49
6% 48.7 Pts
64-Core 48.9
3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 15BD) 775MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.91
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.09
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 46 58 48 63 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 65
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 54.2
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-H9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X200MA Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X200MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback