Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2840 20,923 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 64.8 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 48 33% 45.8 Pts	4-Core 48.3 8-Core 49 6% 48.7 Pts	64-Core 48.9 3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 15BD) 775MB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.68% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.91 1% 0.96 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0.09 1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.68% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 243GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2OAF10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 46 58 48 63 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 65.4 Write 65 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 54.2 38% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-H9 1x2GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 6.3 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 18%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	50x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	25x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	25x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	137x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 196 samples	25x
HMT451S6AFR6A-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 16%, 130 samples	23x
EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 24%, 494 samples	22x

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $48