Average Bench: 0.6% (667th of 715)

Based on 90,156 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 0F31 Model: Intel(R) HD Graphics

Terrible average bench

The Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) averaged 99.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 0.53fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 1.13fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) is just 0.55%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 1.07fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 0.66fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 90,156 samples)
Min Avg Max
0.4 Lighting 0.53 1.31
0.4 Reflection 1.07 1.6
0.5 Parallax 0.66 1.2
0.43% 0.75 fps
Min Avg Max
1.3 MRender 1.58 1.9
0.6 Gravity 0.77 0.9
0.9 Splatting 1.13 1.3
0.97% 1.16 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 2190) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.1 fps
Intel(8086 2212) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Legend(17AA 3695) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
HP(103C 2B28) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.1 fps
Legend(17AA 3695) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.1
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.1 fps
HP(103C 233A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.27 fps
Dell(1028 064D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Asus(1043 15BD) 1,023MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5146
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Acer(1025 087F) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.97 fps
90,156 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,818,539 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 90,156 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Legend(17AA 3905) 6% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3909) 5% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 21DE) 5% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0936) 5% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2213) 4% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 14DD) 4% 1% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 F910) 4% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 085E) 3% 1% ± 0%
ASRock(1849 0F31) 3% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 0F31) 3% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0939) 2% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 161D) 2% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3986) 2% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8534) 2% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 2224) 2% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 16DD) 2% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0845) 2% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2190) 2% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 089D) 2% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3695) 2% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 176D) 2% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2209) 2% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0905) 1% 1% ± 0%
Elitegroup(1019 7ED4) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 220F) 1% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 068D) 1% 1% ± 0%
Device(1297 2041) 1% 1% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 15CD) 1% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 064D) 1% 1% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0667) 1% 1% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FA2B) 1% 1% ± 0%
Asus(1043 15BD) 1% 1% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 2213) 1% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0860) 1% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3985) 1% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0934) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 227C) 1% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3908) 1% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 2212) 1% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 087F) 1% 1% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2B15) 1% 1% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 368D) 1% 1% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1% 1% ± 0%
HP(103C 2B28) 0% 1% ± 0%
Device(1D05 100F) 0% 1% ± 0%
Intel(8086 7270) 0% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 093A) 0% 1% ± 0%
Acer(1025 093F) 0% 1% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) Builds (Compare 3,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28

Popular HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Average

3 years ago.

This GPU is made for really cheap tablets and laptops, I don't know why people expect this GPU to play games, it runs Minecraft just fine, or some other really light game , not much more than that.


Excellent

3 years ago.

So much better than 3090, recently bought cyberpunk and it runs at ultra graphics 999 fps. reccomend


Excellent

15 months ago.

Much better than rtx 3070 fr fr


Terrible

4 years ago.

It's ok enough for my grandma's laptop, but why bother with it?


Terrible

4 years ago.

Ugh...I have this iGPU in two of my laptops and it struggles to maintain 45 FPS in Minecraft at low settings, WITH OPTIFINE!


Terrible

5 years ago.

I hate in test userbenchmark is 2.5fps all the test.


Terrible

4 years ago.

Why? Don't even bother.


Terrible

5 years ago.

The iGPU in the Celeron J1900 is a joke. Worse than a GeForce 210. Games like Halo Custom Edition from 2004 struggle to run at 60 FPS - on the low / medium settings on 800 x 600.


Average

2 years ago.

It's not a gaming GPU, but does play low level graphics games like old Total War games or other strategy games. It can play some modern games on low graphics settings, but other then that it doesn't do much.


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback