Fujitsu LIFEBOOK UH572

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK UH572  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB31
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 09 '16 at 06:14
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 37.6
29% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 53.7
8-Core 54.3
7% 54 Pts
64-Core 53.2
3% 53.2 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 2.59
3% 3.66 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.07
Splatting 6.74
4% 4.51 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 65.9
Write 76
Mixed 61.3
51% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.19
44% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 63%
WD Elements 2TB
2TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29
Write 21.9
Mixed 22.2
30% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 44%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB
480GB free, PID 0105
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 21.8
Mixed 9.67
23% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.34
71% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 23%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
409GB free, PID 01d8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 21.2
Mixed 16.7
26% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.15
29% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK UH572 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK UH572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback