To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '18 at 15:45
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ 5,400 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 38.9 2-Core 77.3 36% 57.6 Pts	4-Core 77.4 8-Core 78.1 10% 77.8 Pts	64-Core 76.7 5% 76.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 LE 202 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 8228) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.23% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.42 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.23% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDP725025GLA 250GB 335 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: GM2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 71 80 78 82 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 82.4 Write 83.1 Mixed 48 SusWrite 75.2 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 49%
UFD USB Flash Drive 8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID c75a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.3 7.4 7.3 6.9 7.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Read 4.5 Write 4.8 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 7.1 8% 5.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16