Packard ixtreme M5741

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Packard ixtreme M5741 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard H57M01
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '16 at 04:45
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 81.3 2-Core 157 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 374 38% 308 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320 2,109 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.73 Reflection 6.35 Parallax 1.94 4% 4.34 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 3.48 3% 4.26 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 254 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 191 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1876351279	61.3% Good	Read 265 Write 212 Mixed 218 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 31.9 97% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 74.4 79% 132 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 393GB free Firmware: 100. Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 85.9 Write 78.8 Mixed 29 47% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.34 109% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 157GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 53 (03) Spinup time 112 107 7358 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3681 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5373 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3560 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 319 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 176 176 73676 (C2) HDA temperature 112 96 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	61.3% Good	Read 107 Write 107 Mixed 109 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.32 84% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 8.2 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 8.6 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ixtreme M5741 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5741

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $66Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	15x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	8x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	5x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	4x

SSD
CV3-CE256-11 SATA 256GBLiteonBench 79%, 636 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
520 Series 120GBIntel $199Bench 74%, 19,348 samples	2x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 4x2GBHitachiBench 37%, 282 samples	4x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	3x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B2873FHS-CH9 3GBSamsungBench 22%, 114 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $66

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16