Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '14 at 16:43
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
87% 192 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 724
72% 587 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B E177) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 21.6
18% 20.1 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 19.8
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 4TB
869GB free
Firmware: V1.0
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 348
Write 353
Mixed 357
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 21.2
102% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 99.9
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 21.1
43% 86 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 114%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
687GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 353
Mixed 357
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 25.4
150% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 24.9
94% 213 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
238GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 503
Mixed 503
114% 510 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 25
159% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 37.8
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 25.1
36% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Seagate NAS HDD 2TB-$98
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC42 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 171
Write 142
Mixed 145
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.2
75% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 100%
Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback