bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 983 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 08:56
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 119
44% 75 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 268
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 114 109 114 115 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 348
Write 254
Mixed 312
SusWrite 114
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 8.4
20% 6.73 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 133
106% 151 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
50GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 231 226 233 234 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 420
Write 245
Mixed 384
SusWrite 230
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 13.5
53% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 158
120% 162 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 27GB
24GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 114 110 114 115 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 413
Write 293
Mixed 382
SusWrite 113
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 11.8
48% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 153
117% 160 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback