HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160601
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 18:10
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 132
57% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 423
39% 327 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700
Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S 240GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 162 102 82 42 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 410
Write 386
Mixed 40
SusWrite 128
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 36
96% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9P1 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 36.9
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback