Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B77
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '18 at 19:57
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 86.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 813 76% 634 Pts	64-Core 1,318 82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 119 Parallax 99.7 87% 108 fps	MRender 99.8 Gravity 96.7 Splatting 106 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2195 606 562 561 566 565 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	280% Outstanding	Read 2,510 Write 2,307 Mixed 1,624 SusWrite 843 407% 1,821 MB/s	4K Read 61 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 80.4 269% 93.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,106 DQ Write 893 DQ Mixed 1,019 758% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 280% Great: 340%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 395GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 40 41 41 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.1% Poor	Read 40.3 Write 39.2 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 40.8 9% 40.2 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 13.9 47% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 29.6 DQ Mixed 33 25% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 61GB free Firmware: JKAOA28A SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 35 35 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29% Poor	Read 66 Write 30.8 Mixed 34 SusWrite 35.2 31% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2L3000C15 CMK16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK16GX4M2L3000C15 CMK16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	102% Outstanding	MC Read 38.9 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 35 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 26.9 SC Write 34.6 SC Mixed 30 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	27x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	11x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	11x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	10x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	10x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $851

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16