MSI MS-7374

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	MSI MS-7374 (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080603
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '18 at 09:39
Run Duration	1649 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9650-$125 2,698 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 66 1-Core 33.4 2-Core 65.4 37% 54.9 Pts	4-Core 90.9 8-Core 105 13% 98.1 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1300 685 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Gigabyte(1458 2144) 128MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Ignite 480GB-$148 2,730 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.2 30 60 52 55 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.1% Average	Read 127 Write 103 Mixed 110 SusWrite 36.6 21% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 27 92% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 87.6 DQ Mixed 72.7 61% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 129GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 27 46 42 37 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 66.8 Write 77 Mixed 40 SusWrite 39.8 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.9 48 59 72 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 89.3 Write 85 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 44.3 49% 66.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 9.8 40 46 62 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 95 Write 98 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 38 50% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 60%
Intenso M2M 1TB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 733GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 8.1 12 15 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 44.3 Write 39.5 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 12.8 42% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 39%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 43GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 7.9 11 15 14 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.57% Terrible	Read 12.2 Write 50.3 Mixed 59 SusWrite 12.1 51% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 8.57% Great: 74%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 65GB free, PID 578e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.2 14 16 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 46.5 Write 84.5 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 14.1 58% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.4 109% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 69%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 4TB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 122GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 7.8 12 14 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 58.1 Write 44.3 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 12.4 56% 43 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 69%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 137GB free, PID 6123 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 7.6 11 12 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 67 Write 90.3 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 10.7 68% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.4 221% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 80%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB 811 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 158GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.1 14 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 48.9 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 13.4 60% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 7.4 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.2 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7374 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7374

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	1x
Phenom 9850AMDBench 46%, 2,080 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8800 GTSNvidiaBench 4%, 3,160 samples	1x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x

SSD
SDEZS25-240G-Z01 240GBBench 43%, 706 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16