Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '18 at 15:26
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 69.2 2-Core 126 60% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 274 31% 243 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350 56 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B A00B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.94% Terrible	Lighting 11.8 Reflection 12.9 Parallax 14.3 10% 13 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 14.6 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.94% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 193 196 199 202 198 MB/s Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.8% Above average	Read 264 Write 203 Mixed 202 SusWrite 207 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 23.1 89% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 50.7 DQ Write 54.7 DQ Mixed 48.1 38% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 198GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 175 178 183 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 174 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 180 117% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS543216L9SA00 160GB 1,536 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 149GB free Firmware: FB2Z SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 65 64 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 63.9 Write 61.4 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 64.5 41% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.4% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 15.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 12.1 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	426x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	389x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	203x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	107x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	67x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	66x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	46x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16