User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 09:08
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 198
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 793
70% 595 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350
XFX(1682 7250) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 13.7
0% 8.6 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 9.1
8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 115 120 113 114 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 167
Write 177
Mixed 93
SusWrite 115
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
918GB free
Firmware: K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 45 45 47 42 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 145
Write 153
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 44
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
195% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
315GB free
Firmware: CC6B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 103 120 124 123 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 0.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 99.6
19% 27 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
223% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55
918GB free
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 51 53 52 55 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 53.2
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 19.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback