DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory1.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091026
Uptime15.3 Days
Run DateDec 16 '18 at 00:00
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 130
61% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 290
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 9.81
Parallax 12.5
9% 11 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 13.6
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 55 40 32 40 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 93.8
Write 176
Mixed 148
SusWrite 48.5
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 10.2
39% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 126
92% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
611GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 115 116 111 116 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 65.3
Write 65
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 111
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 75%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
4GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.1 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 5.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 7.2
11% 9.45 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 14%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB
881GB free, PID 1013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 25 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 22.5
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 21.5
30% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback