PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7681 |
Motherboard | MSI P67A-GD65 (MS-7681) (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130109 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 17 '18 at 15:35 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
|
83.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
Asus(1043 04ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 45 51 51 47 48 MB/s
|
59.5%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba Q300 120GB
24GB free
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 54 55 59 53 MB/s
|
44%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
385GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 106 106 104 103 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 155x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 153x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 50x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $541 |