Medion H81H3-EM2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMedion H81H3-EM2  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory0.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateDec 31 '18 at 17:39
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 177
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 310
37% 287 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Elitegroup(1019 1030) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 8.09
9% 10.1 fps
MRender 9.81
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 11.7
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 9.4 8.7 7.6 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 347
Write 10
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 8.6
20% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 8.3
36% 9.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
216GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 83 84 82 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 95.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 77
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 10.5
Mixed 14
SusWrite 11
19% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
114% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 0.1
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-EM2 Builds (Compare 539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medion H81H3-EM2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $354
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback