Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive12.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 04 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 79.1
43% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 65
8-Core 84.8
10% 74.9 Pts
64-Core 85.9
5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
PwrHis(1787 2288) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 5.91
6% 6.01 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 6.35
5% 5.52 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 25 7.8 13 37 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.6% Very poor
Read 92.3
Write 71.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 31.6
13% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 6
21% 6.63 MB/s
DQ Read 9.6
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 11
9% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
98GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 70 94 91 90 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 93
Write 57.5
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 86.6
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback