HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161101
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '19 at 12:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 193
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 510
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
HP(103C 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 361.91
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 14.2
14% 15.1 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 14
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun MZ7LN256HMJP-000 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 59 55 53 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 390
Write 352
Mixed 308
SusWrite 80.2
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 37.8
137% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 65.5
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 112
104% 154 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC - [0x9B85] CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback