Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 14:08
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 745
81% 644 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200806
SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 504 485 472 428 470 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 103%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 316GB
167GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 69 101 87 114 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.8% Good
Read 368
Write 104
Mixed 154
SusWrite 97.7
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 37.3
152% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 37.8
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 67
50% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 72%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
579GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 68
Write 62.8
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 68.7
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 32
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 31.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $702
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback