PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180125 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 22 '19 at 16:49 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 412.16
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN15ABHA 512GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6T3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 319 313 353 354 344 MB/s
|
79.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
567GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 157 155 157 159 157 MB/s
|
82.6%
Excellent
|
|||
USB3.0 USB DISK 3.0 126GB
117GB free, PID 0243, Microcenter 128GB USB 3.0
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 3.6 18 18 6.8 16 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
60.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,239x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,036x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 861x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 740x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 376x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |