Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 07:23
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 160
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 326
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W7100 (FireGL V)
Dell(1028 230C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 55.7
28% 44.6 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 36
Splatting 31.1
29% 36 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS064G3AMNB-2200A 64GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10108L00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 434
Write 154
Mixed 196
57% 261 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 21.1
80% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 180
144% 206 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 35.8
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 19.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback