Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170304
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 17:41
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 141
57% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 221
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.5% Average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 84.5
50% 70.3 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 53.7
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$41
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1025F8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 365 386 392 391 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 388
Write 350
Mixed 349
SusWrite 374
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 42.9
142% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 203
159% 219 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
337GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 138 74 77 77 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 157
Write 101
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 124
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 8.6
42% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 102%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
547GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 112 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 180
Write 162
Mixed 110
SusWrite 113
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
533GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 106 108 106 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 196
Write 161
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 106
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
842GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 35.4
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 24.6
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 65%
Apacer Technology Inc. 320GB
21GB free, PID a102
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 29
Write 27.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 12.9
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 24%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback