Average Bench: 5.92% (384th of 715)

Based on 25,284 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 130F Models: AMD Radeon(TM) R7 Graphics, AMD Radeon R7

Terrible average bench

The AMD Radeon R7 Graphics averaged 94.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 7.23fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 7.17fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics is just 4.31%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 7.94fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 11.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 25,284 samples)
Min Avg Max
4.2 Lighting 7.23 10.4
4.6 Reflection 7.94 10.1
6.2 Parallax 11.7 14.9
5.9% 8.96 fps
Min Avg Max
2.7 MRender 5.31 7.88
4.8 Gravity 9.32 11.7
4.3 Splatting 7.17 9.3
5.97% 7.26 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 85CB) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 8
Parallax 13.1
7% 10 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.37 fps
Elitegroup(1019 9A18) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 12.5
7% 9.9 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 7.8
6% 7.8 fps
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 12
7% 9.57 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 7.6
6% 7.63 fps
HP(103C 2215) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 12.2
7% 9.5 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 7.5
6% 7.57 fps
ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.53 fps
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.3
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.47 fps
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 9.8
3% 6.43 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 5.5
5% 5.5 fps
HP(103C 2B26) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6.9
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.57 fps
25,284 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,803,682 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 25,284 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 85CB) 23% 6% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 11% 6% ± 1%
ASRock(1849 130F) 10% 6% ± 2%
HP(103C 2215) 9% 6% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7721) 8% 6% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 36A0) 5% 6% ± 1%
HP(103C 805A) 4% 6% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0123) 4% 4% ± 1%
Acer(1025 0904) 4% 6% ± 1%
HP(103C 2B35) 3% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 2B53) 3% 6% ± 1%
HP(103C 2B52) 3% 6% ± 1%
Biostar(1565 1708) 2% 7% ± 2%
Elitegroup(1019 9A18) 1% 6% ± 2%
Elitegroup(1019 9BCD) 1% 7% ± 0%
Elitegroup(1019 99D3) 1% 6% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 368F) 1% 6% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7891) 1% 7% ± 1%
HP(103C 2B4A) 1% 5% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 30B2) 1% 5% ± 1%
HP(103C 2B26) 1% 5% ± 1%
AMD(1002 130F) 1% 6% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7793) 0% 6% ± 2%
MSI(1462 7903) 0% 5% ± 3%
MSI(1462 7969) 0% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7900) 0% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 2B60) 0% 5% ± 2%
HP(103C 2B1D) 0% 4% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7913) 0% 7% ± 1%
MSI(1462 7895) 0% 7% ± 0%
Elitegroup(1019 9A19) 0% 7% ± 0%
MSI(1462 7A83) 0% 4% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 30EE) 0% 4% ± 0%
HP(103C 805C) 0% 6% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Radeon R7 Graphics Builds (Compare 1,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $63

Popular Radeon R7 Graphics compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor

1 month ago.

I'ts crap, that can barely do anything more than Roblox


Poor

3 years ago.

Can still play Minecraft at 60 fps


Good

2 months ago.

Terrible. Can barely run fortnite at 720p all low graphics and windowed.

Comment 

i've been using this integrated graphics card for several years now and it only really runs for light gaming such as older video games (gmod, minecraft, etc). Although it might be just me, but it seems to sometimes glitch out the odd time and distort the graphics. Other than that this was just a mid tier IGPU for the time and if you have one I recommend upgrading.—Nov '22


Good

2 years ago.

Been using it for years and still works like a charm.


Good

2 years ago.

I cant even play any games. ugh


Terrible

9 months ago.

because is worse then gtx 1050 ti


Good

2 years ago.

i think that it is much faster


Excellent

2 years ago.

its good for its pretty much free price


Terrible

3 years ago.

I have to suffer with this... i cant upgrade gpu :/


Average

3 years ago.

comes with AMD A10 7700k CPU its great for basic desktop use supports dual display.


Average

2 years ago.

For an IGD of it's age is pretty impressive that it could match budget cards of the time, and it is akin to a GT 740, and it's performance is more dependent on what RAM kit you are using. Please note that these IGDs never were meant for AAA gaming at Ultra settings as some people like to think, these were meant for low-mid settings on AAA titles and mid-high settings on eSport titles. For all those of you who find that your Radeon R7 is underperforming, make sure you have a motherboard with 4 slots, and all those slots populated with DDR3-1866 as a bare minimum, use DDR3-2133 to allow good overclocking gains, and, if you are using slow RAM, better forget about gaming, because Slower RAM will bottleneck it quite badly. Also check that you are effectively running it at it's marked speed, otherwise you will bottleneck this IGD. These IGDs will inevitably underperform on boards that only have 2 slots populated, as DDR3-1866 can only provide 13GB/s of bandwidth per module, and this IGD requires at least 50GB/s to reach it's maximum potential.


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback