Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2 (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20161207
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '19 at 17:26
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 139 59% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 244 33% 244 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 2530) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.27% Terrible	Lighting 9.23 Reflection 9.08 Parallax 7.22 8% 8.51 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 9.17 7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.27% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20 2,184 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.ACB SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 52 60 62 64 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 59.2 Write 52.3 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 60 37% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 42%
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20 2,184 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 58GB free Firmware: 3.ACB SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 59 61 61 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 58.6 Write 57.8 Mixed 35.4 SusWrite 60.4 39% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0- GR1600D364L11 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 17.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	48x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	26x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	24x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16