Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Killer (all builds)
Memory	34.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '19 at 01:36
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 90.8 1-Core 129 2-Core 255 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 784 77% 632 Pts	64-Core 1,002 62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.1% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 45.8 Parallax 37.1 32% 40.8 fps	MRender 56.7 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 51.7 40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 387 370 358 353 348 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 1,809 Write 1,083 Mixed 775 SusWrite 446 227% 1,028 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 62.9 223% 82.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,055 DQ Write 814 DQ Mixed 702 588% 857 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 302%
Corsair Force GT 480GB-$299 252 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 39GB free Firmware: 5.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 199 196 195 181 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 396 Write 230 Mixed 241 SusWrite 190 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 24.3 85% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 91.9 DQ Mixed 113 97% 145 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2133C13 CMK16GX4M4A2133C13 40GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89.2% Excellent	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 31.4 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 23 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 66.1 61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $242

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	51x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	10x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 76%, 29,684 samples	5x
HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 2,054 samples	4x
GR2133D464L15/8G 2x8GBGoodramBench 73%, 520 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16