Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 00:36
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 851
76% 640 Pts
64-Core 2793
173% 2793 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ1LW960HMJP-000MV 960GB
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXV81M1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 971 965 978 966 968 971 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1314
Write 981
Mixed 586
SusWrite 970
215% 963 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 45.9
199% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 815
680% 986 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 219%
Great: 253%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 11 10 10 9.6 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 115
Write 19.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 9.8
34% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
42% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK 2x31.5GB
2 of 12 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 11
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback