Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181106
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '19 at 16:23
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% , 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 249 80% 147 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 923 81% 687 Pts	64-Core 1,973 122% 1,973 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37C4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	137% Outstanding	Lighting 186 Reflection 199 Parallax 217 151% 200 fps	MRender 218 Gravity 186 Splatting 122 138% 176 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 776 626 634 637 625 630 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,618 Write 1,404 Mixed 637 SusWrite 655 240% 1,079 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 44.8 169% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 1,056 DQ Write 901 DQ Mixed 782 639% 913 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 254%
Intel Optane+3.6TBHDD 19 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: 16.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 292 276 154 171 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.8% Very poor	Read 163 Write 140 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 200 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 4% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 120%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 438 441 438 436 433 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 420 Write 415 Mixed 356 SusWrite 438 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 46.2 161% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 349 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 995GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 141 143 143 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 53.7 Write 143 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 142 67% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.9 357% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	MC Read 31 MC Write 49.8 MC Mixed 31.5 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 9.1 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	72x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	56x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $905

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16