Asus X55A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X55A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X55A
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '19 at 13:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B830
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 93.3
48% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 88
8-Core 93.1
12% 90.6 Pts
64-Core 91.3
6% 91.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1013E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 199 153 118 171 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 425
Write 383
Mixed 358
SusWrite 190
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 16.1
77% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 33
65% 132 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 93%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
28GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 7.8 13 7.8 13 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 4.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 9.7
15% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 9%
TOSHIBA MK6465GSX 640GB
42GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 42 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 40.9
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 40.6
51% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X55A Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X55A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback