Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 12:24
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 192
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 480
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 14.6
18% 17.2 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 15.5
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 166 169 187 176 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 354
Write 253
Mixed 251
SusWrite 174
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 14.8
86% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 78.6
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 23.3
38% 72 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
467GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 184 176 182 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 176
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 178
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
326GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 162 160 159 162 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 119
Mixed 77
SusWrite 160
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
435GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 89 86 68 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 37.7
Write 94.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 83.1
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF032 320GB
48GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 6.2 5.2 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 9.3
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 8.1
13% 9.35 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 3.6 3.2 3.3 3.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Read 28.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3.2
8% 9.53 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1333EL Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $612
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback