Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H370HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 04:21
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 663
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 34.5
28% 35.1 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 24.9
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
672GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 401 417 432 402 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 401
Mixed 379
SusWrite 407
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 34.7
122% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 285
227% 317 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
3TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 160 175 161 174 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 138
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 170
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
143GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43% Average
Read 124
Write 26.7
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 25.4
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43%
Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 215 156 132 112 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS832A.C8FR 859B CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 859B CT8G4DFS832A.C8FR 859B CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.3
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback