HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	3 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	23.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '19 at 17:45
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 142 67% 107 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 337 37% 291 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 3506) 1GB CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 5.27 Parallax 3.59 4% 4.42 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 3.22 4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 75 61 55 51 46 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.7% Below average	Read 203 Write 216 Mixed 177 SusWrite 77.4 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 14.4 51% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 94.8 96% 155 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 82%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 686GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 87 86 90 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 80.4 Write 72.8 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 86.2 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 44GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.7 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	198x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	159x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	99x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	11x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16