Asus F2A55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime25.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 14:04
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 109
53% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 18.4
18% 19.1 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Anacomda TS 120GB SSD
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q110
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 224
Write 180
Mixed 5.8
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 12.5
46% 11.5 MB/s
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
788GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 83 155 162 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 112
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 144
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
603GB free
Firmware: MN5O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 80 123 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 116
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 92 165 172 173 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 58.3
Write 78
Mixed 39
SusWrite 153
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Transcend TS1GLK64W6H 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A55-M Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback