Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire TC-780 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '19 at 02:51
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 212 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 405 55% 408 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3256G 256GB 1,070 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 194 186 187 163 153 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 330 Mixed 218 SusWrite 181 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 96.8 4K Mixed 40 157% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 217 187% 278 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 105%
WD My Passport 259B 1TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 696GB free, PID 259b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 41 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 35.1 Write 36.5 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 40.3 49% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 47%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB 8,938 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 525GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 34.3 Write 33.6 Mixed 27 SusWrite 37.5 45% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.9 143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1TB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 36 Write 37.5 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 41 51% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 24 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 31.2 SC Mixed 24.4 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	870x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	232x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	192x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	328x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	175x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	163x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	38x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	32x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	32x

RAM
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	88x
AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 12GBAdataBench 56%, 513 samples	69x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 7,235 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16