Today's hottest deals

Asus K55N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K55N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55N
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '19 at 21:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 66.8
42% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 118
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Asus(1043 105B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 4.03
4% 5.51 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 6.96
4% 5.05 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 69 67 71 77 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
49% Average
Read 101
Write 77.8
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 69.9
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49%
Great: 53%
WDC WD10 TPVT-00U4RT1 1TB
455GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 66.5
Write 63.3
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 67.4
79% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F F3-10666CL9-4GBSQ 8GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55N Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback