Today's hottest deals

MSI 890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 14:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 140
58% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 430
40% 336 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
MSI(1462 2381) 1GB
CLim: 811 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 23
Parallax 15.4
13% 18.3 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.2
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 123 112 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 421
Write 116
Mixed 120
SusWrite 116
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 18.3
99% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 44
66% 129 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 73%
WDC WD10 TPVT-00U4RT1 1TB
652GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 28 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 20.8
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 26.2
30% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640) - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback