Today's hottest deals

Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D PREMIUM  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime8 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 10:03
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$84
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 96.9
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 162
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 405
43% 345 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 71
60% 72.4 fps
MRender 76.1
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 58.4
54% 67.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
626GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 111 117 120 121 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 365
Write 219
Mixed 269
SusWrite 117
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 38.8
127% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 190
142% 190 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
937GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 113 121 122 122 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 365
Write 218
Mixed 266
SusWrite 120
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 39.5
132% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 189
142% 191 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 132%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
565GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 120 133 134 133 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 130
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 94 97 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 152
Write 137
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 99.4
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 101%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
866GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 121 131 136 135 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 175
Write 187
Mixed 95.1
SusWrite 131
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 124 134 139 138 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 170
Write 194
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 134
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 112%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 128 138 134 136 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 159
Write 146
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 136
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 159 182 183 187 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 142
Write 156
Mixed 106
SusWrite 179
201% 146 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
215% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 23
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D PREMIUM Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback