EXO United Gamers M1

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	EXO United Gamers M1 (all builds)
Motherboard	EXO GI5KN5E
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '19 at 00:46
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 206 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 398 54% 404 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(1D05 103C) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1935 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Lighting 42.1 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 38.2 34% 37.2 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 36.3 31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1902 2043 1998 2183 2195 2186 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	351% Outstanding	Read 2615 Write 2,190 Mixed 1,411 SusWrite 2,085 465% 2075 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 75.4 255% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 968 DQ Write 847 DQ Mixed 905 679% 906 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 351% Great: 393%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 157GB free Firmware: UJ190000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 141 143 150 150 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 411 Write 243 Mixed 266 SusWrite 173 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 13.7 58% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 82.7 DQ Mixed 41.4 47% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 596GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 111 110 105 114 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 64.2 Write 92 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 110 60% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 179% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-044.A00G Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 24.3 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 25.3 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

EXO United Gamers M1

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)