Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 20:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$195
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 865
82% 680 Pts
64-Core 1377
85% 1377 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Zotac(19DA 5513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 206
Reflection 227
Parallax 205
168% 213 fps
MRender 269
Gravity 220
Splatting 144
166% 211 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 154%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,535
Write 1,247
Mixed 589
248% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 53.1
189% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 780
647% 937 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
48GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 76 98 112 126 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 265
Write 123
Mixed 171
SusWrite 102
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 34.3
125% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 94.7
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 96.2
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W642GU42J5213N8 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Above average
MC Read 15
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 14.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 9.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback