Asrock H170 Performance/Hyper

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H170 Performance/Hyper  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160219
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 14:56
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 145
2-Core 289
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 568
76% 567 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.7% Good
Lighting 83.7
Reflection 81.1
Parallax 70.6
68% 78.5 fps
MRender 73.3
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 74.3
61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 249 273 312 359 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 429
Mixed 353
SusWrite 286
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 43.3
170% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 178
178% 284 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 105%
Great: 99%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
224GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 90.3
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
6GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 42.7
Write 7.7
Mixed 12
SusWrite 8.3
18% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1
77% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBLFU213N02 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 26.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 Performance/Hyper Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock H170 Performance/Hyper

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $578
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback