Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A785-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A785-M  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9750
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 69.2
39% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 114
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 3104) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 16.6
16% 17.1 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 16.5
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 89 93 84 91 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 120
SusWrite 85.9
25% 109 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 21
78% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 29.3
28% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 108 111 111 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 84.5
Mixed 67
SusWrite 106
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 90 93 85 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 141
Write 132
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 87.8
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 146 151 151 151 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
2GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.5
Write 51.5
Mixed 37.8
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 104
Write 113
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 1.8
103% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 70%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
49GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 9.8 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 49
Write 48.2
Mixed 38
SusWrite 4.5
44% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 34%
WDC WD10 EZEX-21M2NA0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 70 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 176
Write 172
Mixed 110
SusWrite 68.9
170% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 63%
ST332082 0SCE 320GB
258GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 68 67 67 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
Read 67.3
Write 73.7
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 65.6
84% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
80% 0.97 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 9
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A785-M Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback