PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120626 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 25 '19 at 18:07 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
|
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 145 84 78 76 61 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
135GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 120 123 122 MB/s
|
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
236GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 132 137 137 136 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend JM1600KLH-4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 40x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 39x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $370 |