Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 18:07
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 127
57% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 199
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 36.2
21% 29.1 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 26
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 145 84 78 76 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 256
Write 302
Mixed 255
SusWrite 115
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 32.8
108% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 41.9
33% 45 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
135GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 120 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 129
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 120
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
236GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 132 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 168
Write 64.5
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 134
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback