Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160825
Uptime17.6 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 09:34
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$282
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.9% Very good
SC Int 110
SC Float 114
SC Mixed 110
89% 111 Pts
QC Int 367
QC Float 381
QC Mixed 358
84% 369 Pts
MC Int 531
MC Float 576
MC Mixed 560
83% 555 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 32.3
12% 37.6 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 34.5
14% 31.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 14%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 59 34 37 74 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 55.7
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
199GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 120 119 122 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 121
Write 84.7
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 120
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$73
226GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 21 29 20 21 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 86
Write 50.2
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 21.7
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 68%
Disco virtuale Microsoft 107GB
99GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 4.1 5.1 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
Read 74
Write 17
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 5.3
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
30.6% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $478
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $144Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback