Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160825
Uptime17.6 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 09:34
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$360
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.5% Good
1-Core 110
2-Core 212
76% 161 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 570
59% 464 Pts
64-Core 560
38% 560 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 32.3
11% 37.6 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 34.5
10% 31.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 59 34 37 74 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 55.7
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$53
199GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 120 119 122 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 121
Write 84.7
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 120
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
226GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 21 29 20 21 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 86
Write 50.2
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 21.7
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 69%
Disco virtuale Microsoft 107GB
99GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 4.1 5.1 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
Read 74
Write 17
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 5.3
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
30.6% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $490
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback