Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime18.6 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 20:10
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 328
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 10.9
11% 13.4 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.6
11% 13 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$45
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 77 74 83 91 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 112
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 80.4
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback