Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110627
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 07:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 96.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 444
60% 448 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 51.2
Parallax 61.7
43% 55.1 fps
MRender 55.8
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 46.9
41% 50.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 463
Write 440
Mixed 339
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 37.1
136% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 61.4
114% 224 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 137
Write 40.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 42.1
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-151.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback