Lenovo 4524RL2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4524RL2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 23:26
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 170
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 458
49% 390 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
223GB free
Firmware: 517a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 448 449 450 449 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 453
Write 465
Mixed 383
SusWrite 449
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 28.1
104% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 300
216% 277 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 99%
TEAML5Lite3D480G 480GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 425 426 418 426 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 463
Mixed 428
SusWrite 428
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 43.6
143% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 89.6
94% 158 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 127%
JMicron Generic DISK00 240GB
199GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 174
Mixed 171
SusWrite 15
174% 134 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 21.8
1,680% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 25.8
2,065% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 112%
Great: 143%
JMicron Generic DISK01 240GB
223GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 175
Mixed 173
SusWrite 0.1
169% 131 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 22.4
1,707% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 27.1
2,127% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
JMicron Generic DISK00 2TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 136
Write 128
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 117
148% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK02 480GB
428GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 119 119 118 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
135% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 175
Mixed 168
SusWrite 119
215% 160 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 22.7
1,719% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 27.6
2,154% 28.2 MB/s
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 141
Write 126
Mixed 70
SusWrite 16
108% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 56%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
28GB free, PID dd1a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.6 11 9.2 8.4 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 9.3
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 10.9
27% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
109% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12%
Great: 32%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 126 127 128 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 137
Write 130
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 126
153% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4524RL2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4524RL2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback