HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 08:43
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 890
88% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,122
69% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 52.6
48% 57.1 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 63.1
52% 62.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 915
Write 663
Mixed 704
169% 761 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 50.4
161% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 290
269% 418 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 164%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
219GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 126 126 126 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 104
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 126
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
624GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 129 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 20
SusWrite 127
138% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback