bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7.91GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.91GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory4.9 GB free of 7.90625 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '19 at 15:55
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6132
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 81
2-Core 92.7
49% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 95
8-Core 93.2
13% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 75.9
5% 75.9 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 129GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 34 6.4 11 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 7.2
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 16.5
8% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
3968, 4128 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 8.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 6.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback