Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '19 at 04:26
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 289
40% 295 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 30.2
28% 29.9 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 31.7
28% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 43GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,014
Write 6,132
Mixed 5,274
4,595% 6,140 MB/s
4K Read 389
4K Write 344
4K Mixed 309
56,913% 347 MB/s
DQ Read 1,205
DQ Write 1,209
DQ Mixed 1,105
10,433% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 42%
52netbar iShareDisk 960GB
97GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 73 70 74 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 39.5
Write 79.7
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 72.5
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 4.9
796% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback