Asus P8H61-M LX PLUS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX PLUS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120728
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 14:37
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$72
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 136
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 195
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 550
Sapphire(1DA2 E371) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 23.6
16% 23.4 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 29.6
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
55GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 133 132 133 166 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 198
Write 107
Mixed 110
SusWrite 154
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 16.1
66% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 19.3
16% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 85%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM2OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 58 42 59 63 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 67.6
Mixed 41
SusWrite 53.2
42% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX PLUS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback