ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180928
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '19 at 03:49
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 242 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 562 62% 487 Pts	64-Core 636 39% 636 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.28% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 24.6 Parallax 6.75 6% 13 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 15 10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.28% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB 18,615 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 564 260 260 260 260 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 665 Mixed 616 SusWrite 368 122% 539 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 17.8 65% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 693 DQ Write 708 DQ Mixed 582 470% 661 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 126%
Spcc Sol id State Dis 120GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 89GB free Firmware: S9FM SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 75 76 77 83 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.1% Below average	Read 351 Write 71.9 Mixed 119 SusWrite 74.4 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 7.9 40% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 62 DQ Mixed 23.3 34% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 64%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 892GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 139 140 138 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 145 Write 137 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 136 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.6 230% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 2x16GB 2,460 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 26.8 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 36.8 SC Mixed 26.4 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,718x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	934x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,584x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,067x
RX 5700-XTAMD $150Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	326x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	123x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	112x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	885x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	221x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback