Intel GA8-IBLV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel GA8-IBLV (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121211
Uptime	30.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '16 at 22:32
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D510-$115 463 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 44.9 1-Core 6.4 2-Core 12.6 18% 21.3 Pts	4-Core 23.5 8-Core 23.5 3% 23.5 Pts	64-Core 23.5 2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 64GB-$25 656 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 17GB free Firmware: X231600 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 1177 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 32 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 21 (A8) Unknown 100 100 34 (A9) Unknown 100 100 88 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 20 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 32 137440460832 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 6 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 168 (F1) Unknown 253 253 87 (F2) Unknown 253 253 13 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	40.5% Average	Read 236 Write 145 Mixed 147 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 12.9 69% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 59.6 DQ Mixed 14.1 19% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 79%
Msft Virtual Disk 43GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 149 Write 126 Mixed 115 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 9.52 46% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 33.3 DQ Mixed 11.7 14% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 92%
innostor USB 3.0 8GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 0916 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	6.41% Terrible	Read 25.2 Write 7.69 Mixed 10.2 15% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.46 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.008 17% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.41% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM 0h 667 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Intel GA8-IBLV

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)